On ZDNet: 5 ways to prevent IT failure

Talking Shop: Sort through FUD on Microsoft product activation

Tags: Ed Bott

  • Save
  • Print
  • Digg This
  • 0

Takeaway: An explanation of how Microsoft product activation works


Fear, uncertainty, and doubt. Through the years, Microsoft's rivals have accused the company of using FUD as a way to stifle competition. Now, ironically, those same tactics are being turned against the Redmond giant. Its reported plans to require "activation" of Windows XP as an antipiracy tactic have TechRepublic members up in arms, as evidenced by the response to my most recent Microsoft Challenge and another, similar discussion elsewhere on TechRepublic's boards.

IT professionals are among the best informed and most sophisticated of all Microsoft's customers. So it's especially disturbing to see what a terrible job the company has done in explaining how this new policy will affect its customers—at home and in corporations. You can read Microsoft's official Product Activation Fact Sheet and Product Activation Q&A, but most people won't. And you can expect a huge number of misinformed reporters to repeat the myths and misunderstandings expressed by fearful users.

In three consecutive columns, I plan to tackle the product activation issue head-on. This week, I'll look at some of the unjustified fears engendered by this new policy. Next week, I'll focus on the legitimate concerns and unanswered questions raised by this policy. Finally, in two weeks, I'll use your suggestions to tell Microsoft how they ought to run this scheme.

First, here’s an overview of how product activation is supposed to work. When you install Windows XP or Office XP from a retail CD, you'll have 30 days to contact Microsoft to get an activation code. For most users with an Internet connection, this will happen automatically. The activation process generates a "fingerprint" based on the hardware in your system and associates that with your 25-character Product ID. If you reinstall the software on the same system, you can reactivate it automatically. If you try to install the software on another machine with substantially different hardware, however, you may have to call Microsoft to get a new activation code.

Here are a few of the fears, uncertainties, and doubts that cropped up in responses to this week's Challenge:
  • Every time you reinstall Windows, you'll need a new code. R. Kinner is already prepared to join a class action lawsuit against Microsoft: "If I, as a home user, am forced over the course of a year to reinstall XP five times, and MS refuses me a sixth code, they are the ones breaking the commerce contract that was begun when I purchased the software." Call off the lawyers! You can reinstall Windows or Office XP an unlimited number of times on the same hardware. The activation will be automatic.
  • You'll need to call MS for permission every time you replace a piece of hardware. Member PRT wrote, "It could be a nightmare if each install on the hardware generates a different key, requiring a new activation. Microsoft never pins down what a 'significant hardware change' is that would require a new activation. I'm sure upgrading your system board will require a new activation, but how about doubling your RAM, adding or replacing a hard drive, updating your BIOS?" We won't know until the software is finally released, but a Microsoft spokesman assured me that none of these garden-variety upgrades will be an issue. Microsoft says the algorithm that generates the hardware fingerprint won't force a reactivation until you've essentially rebuilt the computer.
  • It's a violation of privacy. A member who prefers to remain anonymous wrote, "I think it is an invasion of privacy. I don't send in registration cards, because I don't want companies having my personal data." Another nonissue. Activation requires no personal information at all. As with all Microsoft products, users will have the option to register Office XP and Windows XP, but the only required data point on the product activation screen is the country you're in.
  • Every individual in a corporation will be forced to get a unique license code. Repeatedly, TechRepublic members expressed concerns like this one from Blaine Moore: "Imagine having a thousand people from one company trying to get codes at the same time, or one admin needing a thousand codes for different machines?" Another member, with the colorful handle skkzarg_death, explained why this shouldn't be a problem for most organizations: "Those with MSDN, Select, or other subscription plans will have a 'blank license' allowing them to install and use one 'copy' for multiple installs. Rolling out XP for me thus won't be an issue, except the beta I have isn't worth the CD it's pressed onto!"
  • Pirates will crack it in no time. Two TechRepublic members, in fact, helpfully posted detailed instructions for bypassing the activation requirement in current beta copies. Microsoft tells me those backdoors will be removed from the final shipping code; they're only there to facilitate the testing process. And that argument misses the point, anyway: Of course pirates will crack this protection scheme. The point of activation is to prevent casual copying by home users and crooked resellers. Microsoft has an army of lawyers to do battle with pirates who work on a larger scale.

Next week: The problems Microsoft hasn't addressed yet.

Here's Ed's new Challenge
TechRepublic members have made it clear that Microsoft is risking a public relations nightmare with its insistence on requiring product activation for Windows XP and Office XP. But the company responds that it has to do something to prevent piracy, especially in the home market. Some users are getting ripped off by crooked resellers who preload bootleg copies of Windows and Office, they say, and others are turning into criminals by using CD burners to press illegal copies of Windows disks for family and friends.

OK, if product activation isn't the answer, then what is? Imagine you're running the Windows or Office business at Microsoft—how do you keep your product from being stolen without inconveniencing your customers or holding their PCs hostage? I'll take the best suggestions and pass them along to Microsoft. If you think you’ve got the answers, click here to tackle this week's Microsoft Challenge. I'll print the best responses two weeks from today.
If you'd like to share your opinion, start a discussion below or send the editor an e-mail.
  • Save
  • Print
  • Digg This
  • 0

Print/View all Posts Comments on this article

PricePhilbert  | 03/08/01
Price PointsShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
Tired of MicrostupidShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
correction on your acronymjvel  | 03/11/01
Anti piracyShanghai Sam  | 03/10/01
Costs of development...Scott Roche  | 03/12/01
don't buy if it isn't worth it for youXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
Check The EULA!NKX  | 10/23/01
Look at all the funny facesgavin@...  | 03/12/01
Show Me the Money!colugbala@...  | 03/13/01
Ain't that the Truth!kencraft@...  | 03/13/01
The cost structureJay_H  | 03/13/01
Open Source? Yes.brike@...  | 04/27/01
Price vs. needShanghai Sam  | 03/11/01
Well...fri6@...  | 03/12/01
Towards Time Limited Licensingerdo@...  | 03/12/01
Of course you're right.epepke@...  | 03/12/01
I don't think costs will rise thoughXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
An observation...kcmplex  | 03/19/01
The real reason as I see itBranes  | 03/28/01
You are right!brike@...  | 03/29/01
really??Xtrapollis  | 03/29/01
they should have mult-license optionXtrapollis  | 03/29/01
Not Only Pricebenoddo@...  | 03/12/01
Pricing Structurestevec@...  | 03/12/01
Just say no!multimedians@...  | 03/12/01
I'm with you!TranMan  | 03/13/01
bought a copy of Office 97 lately?admin@...  | 03/14/01
They're aroundmultimedians@...  | 03/14/01
Buy the next version...Joe_Snuffy  | 03/15/01
I've heard this... but....admin@...  | 03/15/01
Heard this... but....Joe_Snuffy  | 03/15/01
A different kind of concern.Jay_H  | 03/13/01
where are the economic calculationsXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
OK "Bill Gates" Xtrapollismultimedians@...  | 03/13/01
not for home usersXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
The transition point is heremultimedians@...  | 03/14/01
Price? Not the real reason.BigJelloSheriff  | 03/14/01
Huh?dksj  | 03/15/01
Bill underhandedly aquired Linux rights!admin@...  | 03/14/01
you guys haven't been keeping upXtrapollis  | 03/14/01
Yes....... for some businesses......admin@...  | 03/15/01
Just put it back in audit mode...realgecko@...  | 03/15/01
Not to mention the fact that....w_dayton@...  | 03/30/01
okay then...Xtrapollis  | 03/30/01
Oh Blah... Bad IdeaNKX  | 10/23/01
XP Activation Codechanf_2000@...  | 03/08/01
Hackers and Crackers will beat itShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
AgreedShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
XP Activation Code, Part IIIShanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
most PC don't spontaneously explodeXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
then what's the point for MS?Jay_H  | 03/14/01
maybeXtrapollis  | 03/14/01
oil cooled pentium....admin@...  | 03/15/01
multiple computer work stations?Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
that's a good oneXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
MS - Linuxjvel  | 03/11/01
there is no inconvenienceXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
Mmmm.. yes, but imagine the response!admin@...  | 03/15/01
What will happen if...digital_blue22@...  | 03/14/01
read the articleXtrapollis  | 03/14/01
The simple truthoz_dart  | 10/23/01
Microsoft has lost its mindbrike@...  | 03/27/01
where is your mindShanghai Sam  | 03/29/01
MS owns allgutridgesj@...  | 03/08/01
I hope it is not hackableShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
KOffice? Very promising but...syljoyeux  | 03/11/01
KOffice? Very promising but...syljoyeux  | 03/11/01
Office software solutionsad3pt  | 03/12/01
Greedy / Ignorant MSjvel  | 03/11/01
Get Real!ptrn  | 08/06/01
My favorite line of the articlet_bonee  | 03/12/01
Cost of Activatingjvel  | 03/12/01
paranoiaXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
Paranoia!rbaer@...  | 03/14/01
paranoia!!Xtrapollis  | 03/14/01
kudosadmin@...  | 03/15/01
Here is an example of harmDukat  | 03/15/01
that's no goodShanghai Sam  | 03/29/01
no good, try againShanghai Sam  | 03/29/01
MS wants to join "spy ranks"?admin@...  | 03/15/01
Here's a thought......ptrn  | 08/06/01
Easy solutionmhar@...  | 03/14/01
Brute ForceKWV  | 03/14/01
if it's so easy, code your own OSXtrapollis  | 03/14/01
Alternativeslarry_phillips@...  | 03/08/01
StarOfficeShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
I will live without microsoftShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
More alternatives are what we needShanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
Library Catalogtwhaight@...  | 03/12/01
The alternatives are there...  | 03/12/01
I agree.....admin@...  | 03/15/01
We just need to dump this monopolyShanghai Sam  | 03/10/01
you put the monopoly thereXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
Level of Discomfortinfosecaja  | 03/14/01
I suspect they will .......admin@...  | 03/15/01
Ed, your first two points contradict.VoodooV  | 03/08/01
EdificationScott Roche  | 03/08/01
Professional Hackers?admin@...  | 03/15/01
NopeScott Roche  | 03/15/01
Hackingadmin@...  | 03/16/01
here's a small start for the beginnersXtrapollis  | 03/29/01
Like a VirusShanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
MuHAhahaha.... !admin@...  | 03/15/01
Agreed!Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
hardware rebuildXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
Hackers=Pirates?admin@...  | 03/15/01
FUD stuffTrekker  | 03/08/01
NT Workstation at home recomendedjvel  | 03/12/01
What you think is not the issueJay_H  | 03/14/01
Microsoft needs to lower pricesryan@...  | 03/08/01
Lower prices aren't necessary...Scott Roche  | 03/08/01
Yes most computers come with windows installed,...ryan@...  | 03/08/01
The majority of home users...Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
lower prices BAHShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
I agree mostly...Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
Price of activationGil Freund  | 03/08/01
wow edSiliconScout  | 03/08/01
Amazing....Scott Roche  | 03/08/01
when laws don't work....out they goVoodooV  | 03/08/01
Oh I see...Scott Roche  | 03/08/01
Don't put words in my mouthShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
I hate to be redundant but..Shanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
Scott...Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
Well there's no need to be insultingShanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
he without sin cast the first stoneJay_H  | 03/14/01
Casting AwayScott Roche  | 03/14/01
Mmmm... Scott....admin@...  | 03/15/01
Who said anything about open source...Scott Roche  | 03/15/01
Hacking Open Sourceadmin@...  | 03/16/01
MS may makeup the cost through marketingCLightne  | 03/12/01
Just say "No" (if only that were an optiShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
Bill: it's the price, stupid!Shanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
Watch the priceShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
Yes they still wouldShanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
It's not just prices......Shanghai Sam  | 03/10/01
Congratulations!!jvel  | 03/12/01
Econ 101, anyone?admin@...  | 03/15/01
P.S.admin@...  | 03/15/01
Hacking the code is a non-issue DoS is.Shanghai Sam  | 03/08/01
Amen...Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
Hmmmm.....admin@...  | 03/15/01
Ed,Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
Just a thought...Shanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
No unique license for Select customersShanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
they're going to need more optionsShanghai Sam  | 03/09/01
Piracy, pricing and activationsbasilard  | 03/12/01
Ahemepepke@...  | 03/12/01
Halleluiah!! - You tell him!!jvel  | 03/12/01
Just woke upbasilard  | 03/12/01
I notice you didn't respondepepke@...  | 03/12/01
My replybasilard  | 03/12/01
HoweverShanghai Sam  | 03/12/01
AnalogiesScott Roche  | 03/12/01
Wake up!!!jvel  | 03/12/01
I agreebasilard  | 03/12/01
you know little of MSXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
Not so well stated argumentbasilard  | 03/12/01
Absolutely!!!Scott Roche  | 03/13/01
good stuffXtrapollis  | 03/13/01
Apples and Applesbenoddo@...  | 03/13/01
"Betamax Law" doesn't applyScott Roche  | 03/13/01
MS is punishing the wrong peoplejsteele@...  | 03/15/01
Then what do you recommend....Scott Roche  | 03/15/01
what do you suggestXtrapollis  | 03/29/01
A while ago, doctors entered patients' health i...brike@...  | 03/30/01
No one is stopping you.....admin@...  | 03/30/01
Sounds like Russia to me....brike@...  | 03/30/01
Ghost and other issuesarthur-b@...  | 03/12/01
Imaging is a major worryTimHg  | 03/13/01
Linux maybe?cybergeekie  | 03/12/01
Linux maybe? Linux definitely!pljones@...  | 03/12/01
I really wanna know: what is a rebuild?  | 03/12/01
Duh ... What's a CPU ID For?ARealOldTimerFromIBM360Days  | 03/12/01
MS=BATF?Chrystoph  | 03/13/01
Not all CPUs have CPU IDs  | 03/21/01
Ghosting issues?wee frau  | 03/13/01
Ghosting isn't the only problem I seeButthammer99  | 03/14/01
FUDrthorpe@...  | 03/13/01
Moving too fastT. Kendall  | 03/14/01
maybe too fastXtrapollis  | 03/14/01
Agian another reason for Linuxdhalter@...  | 03/14/01
The honeymoon is over...cparker@...  | 03/15/01
Only the country of origin?telco1  | 03/21/01
This is now a moot discussion  | 03/21/01
hardware devices for activating licensesdiaz@...  | 04/27/01
Usually called a "dongle"epepke@...  | 04/27/01
I forgot-they also have a network schemediaz@...  | 04/27/01
Another ideabrike@...  | 04/27/01
Hash of hardwarehack_2600@...  | 06/21/01
Probably not a real hashepepke@...  | 06/22/01
welltekid_rocks@...  | 08/24/01
free ostekid_rocks@...  | 08/29/01

What do you think?

Article Categories

Security
Security Solutions, IT Locksmith
Networking and Communications
E-mail Administration NetNote, Cisco Routers and Switches
CIO and IT Management
Project Management, CIO Issues, Strategies that Scale
Desktops, Laptops & OS
Windows 2000 Professional, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Access, Windows XP,
Data Management
Oracle, SQL Server
Servers
Windows NT, Linux NetNote, Windows Server 2003
Career Development
Geek Trivia
Software/Web Development
Web Development Zone, Visual Basic, .NET